唔該想問下有關partnership dissolution-settlement of liabilities
佢有幾隻情況，好多唔同字眼，如下
_______________________________________________________
Eg.1
- Creditors $5000, with $200 discount received.
One of the partner, Jason, promises to pay off the liabilities.
Creditor AC- (Dr. side):
Capital- Jason $4800
Realization- Disc. Received $200
Realization AC- (Cr. Side):
Creditor- disc. Received $200
______________________________________________________________
Eg.2
- Creditors $5000, with $200 discount received.
One of the partner, Jason, was responsible for paying off the creditors.
Creditor AC- (Dr. side):
Bank $4800
Realization- Disc. Received $200
Realization AC- (Cr. Side):
Creditor- disc. Received $200
_________________________________________________________________
Eg.3
- Creditors $5000, with $200 discount received.
The creditors were to be paid by Jason (partner) with a discount of $200.
Jason settled all the creditors at $4800 out of his own savings.
Creditor AC- (Dr. side):
Capital-Jason $4800
Realization- Disc. Received $200
Realization AC- (Cr. Side):
Creditor- disc. Received $200
_________________________________________________________________
Eg.4
- Creditors $5000, with $200 discount received.
Jason (partner) took over the creditors at book value.
A discount of $200 was allowed to him by the creditors on settlement.
Creditor AC- (Dr. side):
Capital-Jason $5000
Capital AC- (Cr side):
Creditors $5000
___________________________________________________________
1. 我想問4個example之間D字眼上有咩分別？
2. 係唔係Eg 1-3 都係個partner 代公司還住$先，之後公司會比番筆$個Partner?
如果唔係咁姐係應該點？
3. Eg3 既take over liabilities姐係咩意思？比個partner去 take over 有咩意義？
問過老師佢話可能個partner 有方法可以還少D $，就比佢去take over, 但我唔係太明 ;0
Thanksssssssssssssss |
[複製鏈接]
發表於 9-4-2015 01:49:51